The Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) mandates verifiable parental consent for processing any data belonging to minors. While many urban schools can rely on digital platforms for seamless verification, institutions operating in rural and low-digital-literacy environments face obstacles that cannot be ignored. Limited smartphone access, low digital familiarity, shared devices, network issues, and language barriers often make digital-first consent workflows ineffective. Schools must therefore adopt realistic, inclusive approaches that meet legal requirements while respecting the constraints of their communities.
1. Low Digital Literacy Among Parents
Many families are not comfortable navigating online forms, OTP mechanisms, or app-based notifications.
Common barriers include:
2. Inconsistent Access to Digital Devices
Rural households often share a single smartphone among multiple family members.
This creates problems such as:
Schools must avoid designing workflows that assume continuous device access.
3. Connectivity and Network Issues
Many regions experience weak mobile signal, unstable data connectivity, and limited broadband access.
This affects:
Offline-ready solutions become essential.
4. Language and Communication Gaps
If consent forms or digital messages are written in complex or non-local language, it leads to misunderstanding.
This often results in:
Clear, culturally familiar communication is crucial.
5. Overdependence on Students as Intermediaries
In low-digital settings, students often end up filling digital forms or relaying instructions.
This creates risks such as:
DPDPA requires verifiable parental involvement not proxy submissions.
1. School-Based Consent Kiosks
Simple kiosks set up during PTA meetings allow parents to give consent with teacher support.
Benefits:
2. Teacher-Assisted Consent Collection
Teachers can support parents through in-person explanations and form completion.
Effective when:
3. Multilingual, Plain-Language Consent Forms
Clear language helps parents understand what they are agreeing to.
Best practices:
4. Hybrid Paper + Digital Logging Models
Paper-based consent can be physically verified and later digitally logged by staff.
Advantages:
5. Voice-Based or Assisted Digital Consent
Where appropriate, voice consent recorded during parent interactions can serve as verifiable proof when accompanied by physical ID checks.
6. Community Awareness Sessions
Meetings, village workshops, or parent orientation sessions help explain:
This builds trust and increases participation.
A consent framework that adapts to local realities ensures true parent participation, legal compliance, and stronger transparency. When parents understand data responsibilities—even without digital fluency. They engage more meaningfully. Schools become more compliant, families feel respected, and student data is handled responsibly.
Contact us to build a consent system designed for every parent, no matter their digital literacy.
A detailed guide for schools on implementing verifiable...
Learn how India’s DPDPA 2023 transforms how schools han...
Discover how structured vendor governance helps schools...
Understand how India’s Digital Personal Data Protection...
Discover why awareness and training among teachers and...
Explore how schools can ensure DPDPA compliance in 2023...
Discover the top 10 data protection risks Indian school...
Teachers and school staff play a crucial role in protec...
Discover how schools can build trust with parents by sa...